The Mess Hall

There's a MASSIVE comparison write up on eurogamer detailing the differences between the 360 and PS3 versions of the game.
To summerize, it looks like the 360 wins in the graphical dept again.
Remember Red Dead Redemption!
It really makes me wonder if the main development console is the 360 or if Microsoft are paying developers to make inferior looking games on the PS3.

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digit ... -2-faceoff

I think devs nowadays have a tendancy to waver towards either console they prefer, or the ones offering them most $$$$!
Same with dead rising 2 really, MS paid them to make the pre-game case zero for xbox exclusive, so they headed that way.

yes apparently the xbox is supposedly easier to make games for, but a good dev shouldnt see that as a reason not to make the same great game for the ps3 aswell......just lazy otherwise imo. if your going to make a multi-format game, don't make one inferior to the other or you'll get totally flamed by fanboys galore.

sick of this sorta shit, in theory considering the ps3 is more powerful and able to hold greater content on disk, able to display 1080p visuals......why arent we getting the better graphics, LAZY FUCKERS!

It's because the 360 is so much closer to PC development, so devs can bring any and all PC experience to bear on the 360.

However, you show me a 360 game that looks as good as Uncharted 2 during gameplay and I will concede that the platforms are as equally capable graphically.

The PS3 will take time to catch up.