Page 22 of 91

Re: Official Battlefield 3 thread

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:51 pm
by redVENGEANCE
RollieThePollie and BennyTheBuff FTW

Sent from my Hero using Tapatalk

Re: Official Battlefield 3 thread

Posted: Tue Oct 11, 2011 2:39 pm
by Killzone_Kid

Re: Official Battlefield 3 thread

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:12 am
by Killzone_Kid
LMAO, like someone said on EA forums, DICE/EA is top 40 and the hits are just keep coming!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hspYel3WPjQ

Re: Official Battlefield 3 thread

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 2:26 pm
by YorkshirePud
SHIT GOES BOOM

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XbAl5NIFRGQ[/youtube]

One thing stands out from this, the massive radio mast on Caspian border is destructable! i think you'd be damn lucky/unlucky to catch it in a jet on the way down but will it always drop the same way?

can you for instance drop it onto a capture point?

imagine the kill feed from that....

Re: Official Battlefield 3 thread

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 3:18 pm
by redVENGEANCE
how about riding it down from the platform half way up it, presumably parachutes still deploy like bfbc2?

Re: Official Battlefield 3 thread

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 3:49 pm
by InfiniteStates
I hope the structural collapse is procedural this time, instead of scripted like BC2.

Re: Official Battlefield 3 thread

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 9:29 pm
by chrisdfa1
yorkshirepudding wrote:SHIT GOES BOOM

i think you'd be damn lucky/unlucky to catch it in a jet on the way down but will it always drop the same way?
done that already mate, on the pc beta ahahaha.
took off from the US base and flew straight into the bloody thing!
=))

have to admit, never saw the tower collapse once whilst playing it. and that was during3/4hours of playing the same map.

Re: Official Battlefield 3 thread

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 10:43 pm
by Astro
chrisdfa1 wrote:
yorkshirepudding wrote:SHIT GOES BOOM

i think you'd be damn lucky/unlucky to catch it in a jet on the way down but will it always drop the same way?
done that already mate, on the pc beta ahahaha.
took off from the US base and flew straight into the bloody thing!
=))

have to admit, never saw the tower collapse once whilst playing it. and that was during3/4hours of playing the same map.
I think that calls for a private match of mythbusters on caspian once the game comes out. :))

Re: Official Battlefield 3 thread

Posted: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:13 pm
by Killzone_Kid
Saw the TV ad for BF3 on 4MUSIC, it is 99 problems vid. I guess they are trying to attract hip-hop youth.

Re: Official Battlefield 3 thread

Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:01 pm
by Killzone_Kid
Right, if anyone is interested (probably not) I've read through many many forum posts on EA and battlelog and came to the following conclusion: People who are very happy with where BF3 is going are mostly people with low or negative K/D (from BC2) people that have never played any BF games, people who like Nelson Bay, people who prefer infantry to vehicles in general, people that like to camp and snipe.

BTW on the related note zh1nt0 went on telling everyone how they try to accommodate all types of play on all maps so that anyone can find any map attractive, referring to OP Firestorm being huge map with 5 flags stuck next to each other in the small refinery. Really wanted to hear how Operation Metro caters for vehicle lovers.

Re: Official Battlefield 3 thread

Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:29 pm
by InfiniteStates
Killzone_Kid wrote:People who are very happy with where BF3 is going are mostly people with low or negative K/D (from BC2)
K/D ratio is irrelevant. People trying to arm MCOMs while their team do fuck all will lead to a shitty K/D ratio, while trying to win the game. And the flip side of that coin is chopper whoring while your team loses all the flags.

But if you like to worry about K/D ratio, no doubt BF3 will cater to that too.

Re: Official Battlefield 3 thread

Posted: Thu Oct 13, 2011 12:46 pm
by Killzone_Kid
InfiniteStates wrote:
Killzone_Kid wrote:People who are very happy with where BF3 is going are mostly people with low or negative K/D (from BC2)
K/D ratio is irrelevant. People trying to arm MCOMs while their team do fuck all will lead to a shitty K/D ratio, while trying to win the game. And the flip side of that coin is chopper whoring while your team loses all the flags.

But if you like to worry about K/D ratio, no doubt BF3 will cater to that too.
TBH I do not know the reason for this, just an observation. My guess, camping and high damage pays off in BF3. Those who couldn't make it in BC2 suddenly feel they can own.

Re: Official Battlefield 3 thread

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 10:38 am
by chrisdfa1
just making random assumptions now??

the game isnt out yet, people on console have only played 1 map...pc 2.

from this post:
http://blogs.battlefield.ea.com/battlef ... eveal.aspx

i think there doing a pretty good job of trying to cater to all different peoples play styles.

plus as infinite says KD is irrelevant, you only have a high KD (over 2.0) in BC2 if your a chopper pilot/gunner

Re: Official Battlefield 3 thread

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 11:39 am
by Killzone_Kid
Yes Chris only if you are a chopper ho /sarcasm. If I remove all chopper kills and death from my knfmeplz account it will still give me give me K/D of 2+. Same for Sy. Or maybe you're trying to say using vehicles in general gives you good K/D? Well I do agree to that, and this is why I prefer to use them if available, is it bad?

Re: Official Battlefield 3 thread

Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:31 pm
by theENIGMATRON
I think the point that is being made,

Is there is a 2 types of people, Some who sit back and sniper and concentrate on there K/D ratio, Meaning there normally always out of battle trying to pick off the individuals.

While you have the others like us that run into the Combat to complete the achievements
(Or you end up with a loosing Team)

Jumping into the battle will mean your getting killed more instead of sitting back.

This might give you a Lower K/D than someone sitting off in the back doing nothing.

So this can give you a lower score when you a million times better than that person.

This is why it is irrelevant