BF3 vs BC2

[chrisdfa1]

So which do you prefer?
I think Astro's mate pretty much hits the nail on the head tbf (noticed he was in the squad lol)

I do think they tried to hard with BF3, on paper it shouldve been epic. But bad map design and other things aka stingers and hit detection just makes it more of a chore to play.

[YorkshirePud]

I agree with most of those points

mehtro WTF cod map, same for Bazaar. some of the maps are OK like Karg, Caspien? well im not sure it works on 12 v 12. funnily enough the B2K maps are great!

flying in BF3? well i disagree it works IF and this is a big IF. the pilots support the ground as well as dogfighting, fuck the heat seakers, only pussies use them. learn how to dog fight with the cannon. cant tell you how many people ive shot down who then get the red mist and chase me all game trying to lock on to me, all the while im rocketing or guided missile bombing tanks and vehicles on the ground, spot them for me and ill help.

i enjoy BF3 now at first it was hard work now i can shoot well, fly well and have a good idea of the maps. a few things bug me but they are no game breakers.

[DJ-Daz]

My personal opinion is that out of the entire series of games...
Bad company 1 was the pinnacle of gaming nirvana.

1943 comes a close second but it needs more maps.

Bad Company 2 comes 3rd

Battlfield 2042 ties for 3rd

The rest just well, I never really took to them.

Bad Company 1 isnt the best graphically, but the map designs were amazing, some small, some large, very few choke points and fast fluid gameplay.

Also 1 or 2 really good players can make a huge difference to a crap team and end up winning.

So for the most part I agree with Mooney

[InfiniteStates]

My favourite of the franchise is without doubt Modern Combat. Then 2142. Then probably BC1 and BF3 tied, then BC2. 1943 would feature somewhere near the top if it was a proper release, but 1942 is at the bottom of the list.